goglfashion.blogg.se

1. #Control4 programming software full#
2. #Control4 programming software software#
3. #Control4 programming software Pc#
4. #Control4 programming software plus#

Those two mounts have a 30X cost difference. Does your integrator use ultra cheap flat panel mounts or something like this. System cost will not be substantially driven by a Prodigy vs. Control4's treatment of legacy products worries me - I have not been able to bring the older customers hardware into the new set of features (1.6/1.7 and I presume 2.0 doesn't run on the 1st gen hardware.) This is quite a bit different than dealing with old Crestron gear. Although Card Access being Zigbee based is still a huge advantage.Ĭontrol4 is easier and lower cost, Crestron is substantially richer. Crestron needs to enable Sequel Technologies or ELK inside of Prodigy Composer to have some of the same features. I think CardAccess, a 3rd party developer very close to Control4, fills a very cool space that doesn't have a comparable partner in the Crestron developer community. Most "cool" automation functions are easier to implement in Control4 because of the richness of the partner network. Crestron has a really nice interface for the reciever itself. Control4 just uses the reciever as a switcher, moving two-way AM/FM/XM control to their own tuners. Personally, I really like the way Crestron has enabled use of the reciever functions in a really rich way. Control4 is a bit clumsy in managing this - usually the zones are out of sync without a bunch of button presses. It's also fairly straightforward to merge distributed audio zones into a system with a surround zone. Prodigy has programming support to manage a receiver zone 2 output out of the box. The per zone costs are similar expect for the smallest systems.

#Control4 programming software Pc#

The Control4 system can directly play back media files on a PC without any added cost. Everyone complains about the Control4 iPod dock. The iPod dock on the Prodigy side is much stronger.

(I took an advanced environmental control program I wrote that does air monitoring and controls fans + ducts and brought it over to the Prodigy environment - there were no limitations at all.) Using SIMPL, one can make Prodigy part of any larger Crestron system or program the hardware in any way you want. Or one can program the Prodigy system in SIMPL. It produces SIMPL programs - the most powerful and flexible programming tool around. Any arbitrary logic can be built and the user experience can be changed completely.

#Control4 programming software full#

System Builder is a rich point/click authoring tool that produces full programs. Composer produces files editable in another tool called System Builder.

#Control4 programming software plus#

There are plus and minuses to the user experience - Control4 is TV focused, Crestron is remote control focused. Composer provides the same quick configuration model as Control4. Prodigy has 3 levels of programming available. How many clicks to turn on TV in Control4? 5 or 6 usually. a compiled + linked program.) The user model is fixed, however. The program for the control system isn't changing - just the configuration (for geeks - think stored procedures in SQL vs. In Control4, audio/video devices, lights, audio zones can be added and modified very quickly. This eases Control4 integration of 3rd party products while enabling Crestron to have a massively larger group of tightly integrated 3rd party products.įor users, the difference is substantial. Control4 has a strong bias towards Zigbee communication protocol, Crestron has a multi-protocol environment.

#Control4 programming software software#

Crestron has clear separation of hardware and software with many different software tools. We are a dealer for both lines, although we do substantially more work with Crestron.Ĭontrol4 is, at the core, a fixed configuration system with a fixed user experience that modules plug into. Prodigy is a response to Control4 but the two companies approach control very differently.